Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37971612›Full record

ReviewDiscover mental health2023

Navigating the multiple dimensions of the creativity-mental disorder link: a Convergence Mental Health perspective.

David G Angeler, Erin Smith, Michael Berk, Agustín Ibáñez, Harris A Eyre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David G AngelerDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 7050, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden. david.angeler@slu.se.
Erin SmithNeuroscience-Inspired Policy Initiative, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) and the PRODEO Institute, Paris, France.
Michael BerkNeuroscience-Inspired Policy Initiative, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) and the PRODEO Institute, Paris, France.
Agustín IbáñezGlobal Brain Health Institute at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Harris A EyreNeuroscience-Inspired Policy Initiative, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) and the PRODEO Institute, Paris, France.

Funding

US-South American Initiative for Genetic-Neural-Behavioral Interactions in Human Neurodegenerative ResearchR01AG057234 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Claudia Duran-Aniotz, Agustin M. Ibanez · 2019 to 2026
$6.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper discusses a paradox in mental health. It manifests as a relationship between adverse "bad" effects (suffering, clinical costs, loss of productivity) in individuals and populations and advantageous "good" aspects of mental disorders. These beneficial aspects (scientific, artistic and political accomplishments) emanate at the societal level through the frequently unprecedented creativity of people suffering from mental disorders and their relatives. Such gains can contribute to societal innovation and problem-solving. Especially in times of accelerated social-ecological change, approaches are needed that facilitate best-possible mental health care but also recognize creative ideas conducive to beneficial clinical and social-ecological innovations as soon as possible. DISCUSSION: This paper emphasizes the need to account for creativity as a crucial component in evolving mental health systems and societies. It highlights the need for wide-ranging approaches and discusses how research targeting multiple facets (e.g., brain level, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry, neurology, socio-cultural, economic and other factors) might further our understanding of the creativity-mental disorder link and its importance for innovating mental health systems and societies.

conclusionOur discussion clarifies that considerable research will be needed to obtain a better understanding of how creativity associated with mental disorders may help to create more sustainable societies on a fast-changing planet through innovative ideas. Given the current-state-of-the-art of research and healthcare management, our discussion is currently speculative. However, it provides a basis for how pros and cons might be studied in the future through transdisciplinary research and collaborations across sectors of society.

Indexed as

Brain capitalComplex systemsConvergence Mental HealthCreativityMental disordersNeurodivergenceNeuroscienceParadoxPsychiatryStrange loopTransdisciplinary research

Identifiers

PMID37971612
PMCPMC10654284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.