ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2023
The potential for development of clinically relevant microbial resistance to rifaximin-α: a narrative review.
Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increased risk of antimicrobial resistance in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy using rifaximin.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Targeting gut microbiota in liver disease: A pharmacological approach for hepatic encephalopathy and beyond.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
- Rifaximin as a Therapeutic Ally in the Modulation of Dysbiosis: A Narrative Review of Its Applicability in Gastrointestinal Disorders.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Rethinking the WHO AWaRe classification: the need for more detailed guidance.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Review
- Frequent high-level rifaximin resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Rifaximin resistance in Clostridioides difficile is associated with specific rpoB alleles and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) clades.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth and Intestinal Methanogen Overgrowth: Are They Overdiagnosed?Acta gastroenterologica LatinoamericanaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rifaximin-α is a gut-targeted antibiotic indicated for numerous gastrointestinal and liver diseases. Its multifaceted mechanism of action goes beyond direct antimicrobial effects, including alterations in bacterial virulence, cytoprotective effects on host epithelial cells, improvement of impaired intestinal permeability, and reduction of proinflammatory cytokine expression via activation of the pregnane X receptor. Rifaximin-α is virtually non-absorbed, with low systemic drug levels contributing to its excellent safety profile. While there are high concentrations of drug in the colon, low water solubility leads to low colonic drug bioavailability, protecting the gut microbiome. Rifaximin-α appears to be more active in the bile-rich small bowel. Its important biologic effects are largely at sub-inhibitory concentration. Although
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.