Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37971244›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2023

Subcutaneous infusion of high-dose benzathine penicillin G is safe, tolerable, and suitable for less-frequent dosing for rheumatic heart disease secondary prophylaxis: a phase 1 open-label population pharmacokinetic study.

Joseph Kado, Sam Salman, Thel K Hla, Stephanie Enkel, Robert Henderson, Robert M Hand, Adam Hort, Madhu Page-Sharp, Kevin Batty, Brioni R Moore and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Key Considerations in Evaluating Syphilis Therapeutics.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2026
    Article
  6. When and How to Use Subcutaneous Antibiotics.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  7. Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  8. Global heart · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph KadoWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3121-4397
Sam SalmanWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8276-6784
Thel K HlaWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Stephanie EnkelWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Robert HendersonMedical Imaging Department, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Robert M HandWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6448-4559
Adam HortWestern Australian Country Health Service, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Madhu Page-SharpCurtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Kevin BattyCurtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3850-1778
Brioni R MooreWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Julie BennettDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Anneka AndersonTe Kupenga Hauora Maori, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jonathan CarapetisWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Laurens ManningWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4334-5351
The Kids Research Institute Australia · AUCurtin University · AUPrincess Margaret Hospital for Children · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Otago · NZWA Country Health Service · AU

Funding

Cure Kids (CK) 7012DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) GNT1173874DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) GNT1197177Telethon Kids Institute (TKI) Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Top Up ScholarshipUniversity of Western Australia (UWA) Post Graduate Research Scholarship (Athelstan Saw Bequest Fund)University of Western Australia (UWA) Research Program Training ScholarshipUniversity of Western Australia (UWA) StrepA PhD Scholarship, Scholarship for International Research Fees
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 1955, the recommended strategy for rheumatic heart disease (RHD) secondary prophylaxis has been benzathine penicillin G [BPG; 1.2 MU (900 mg)] injections administered intramuscularly every 4 weeks. Due to dosing frequency, pain, and programmatic challenges, adherence is suboptimal. It has previously been demonstrated that BPG delivered subcutaneously at a standard dose is safe and tolerable and has favorable pharmacokinetics, setting the scene for improved regimens with less frequent administration. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous infusions of high-dose BPG were assessed in 24 healthy adult volunteers assigned to receive either 3.6, 7.2, or 10.8 MU (three, six, and nine times the standard dose, respectively) as a single subcutaneous infusion. The delivery of the BPG to the subcutaneous tissue was confirmed with ultrasonography. Safety assessments, pain scores, and penicillin concentrations were measured for 16 weeks post-dose. Subcutaneous infusion of penicillin (SCIP) was generally well tolerated with all participants experiencing transient, mild infusion-site reactions. Prolonged elevated penicillin concentrations were described using a combined zero-order (44 days) and first-order (

Indexed as

Rheumatic FeverRheumatic Heart DiseaseAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansInfusions, SubcutaneousPainPenicillin G BenzathineAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillin G Benzathinebenzathine penicillin Gpopulation pharmacokineticsrheumatic heart diseasesecondary antibiotic prophylaxissubcutaneous infusions

Identifiers

PMID37971244
PMCPMC10720493
OpenAlexW4388734314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.