Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37970922›Full record

ReviewBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2023

A semi-automated microscopic image analysis method for scoring Ki-67 nuclear immunostaining.

S M Fernezlian, C M Baldavira, M L F de Souza, C Farhat, A F de Vilhena, J C N Pereira, J R M de Campos, T Takagaki, M L Balancin, A M Ab'Saber and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

S M FernezlianLaboratório de Genômica e Histomorfometria, Departamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2551-461X
C M BaldaviraLaboratório de Genômica e Histomorfometria, Departamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5364-7305
M L F de SouzaLaboratório de Genômica e Histomorfometria, Departamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7220-5852
C FarhatLaboratório de Genômica e Histomorfometria, Departamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8047-0082
A F de VilhenaDepartamento de Cirurgia Torácica, Instituto do Coração, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7307-3046
J C N PereiraDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3553-7006
J R M de CamposDepartamento de Cirurgia Torácica, Instituto do Coração, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2385-7707
T TakagakiDivisão de Pneumologia, Instituto do Coração, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2277-2100
M L BalancinLaboratório de Genômica e Histomorfometria, Departamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3798-8414
A M Ab'SaberLaboratório de Genômica e Histomorfometria, Departamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6371-177X
V L CapelozziLaboratório de Genômica e Histomorfometria, Departamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9732-5853
Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital do Coração · BRHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRInternational Organization for Migration · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear proliferation marker MIB-1 (Ki-67) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is used to examine tumor cell proliferation. However, the diagnostic or prognostic value of the Ki-67 nuclear staining intensity and location, defined as nuclear gradient (NG), has not been assessed. This study examined the potential association between Ki-67 NG and cell cycle phases and its effect on the prognosis of pulmonary typical carcinoid (PTC) tumors. We propose a method for classifying the NG of Ki-67 during the cell cycle and compare the results between PTC, pulmonary adenocarcinoma (PAD), and breast ductal carcinoma (BDC). A literature review and objective analysis of IHC-stained paraffin sections were used to determine the Ki-67 labeling index and composed a stratification of the NG into NG1, NG2, and NG3/4 categories. A semi-automated image analysis protocol was established to determine the Ki-67 NG in PTC, PAD, and BDC. High intraobserver consistency and moderate interobserver agreement were achieved in the determination of Ki-67 NG in tumor specimens. NG1 and NG2 were lower in PTC than in PAD and BDC. Cox multivariate analysis of PTC after adjusting for age and number of metastatic lymph nodes showed that Ki-67 NG1 and NG2 significantly predicted clinical outcomes. The semi-automated method for quantification of Ki-67 nuclear immunostaining proposed in this study could become a valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool in PTC.

Indexed as

Ki-67 AntigenImmunohistochemistryKi-67 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID37970922
PMCPMC10644968
OpenAlexW4388641680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.