Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37970431›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2023

Optimized extraction technology of glutathione from 'Haidao 86' germ rice by response surface methodology.

Shengquan Ye, Junmei Huang, Wenlong Wu, Jianping Chen, Saiyi Zhong, Guang Qiu, Wei Zhang, Ru Chen, Yijun Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shengquan YeGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Product Processing and Safety, College of Food Science and Technology Guangdong Ocean University Zhanjiang China.
Junmei HuangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Product Processing and Safety, College of Food Science and Technology Guangdong Ocean University Zhanjiang China.
Wenlong WuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Product Processing and Safety, College of Food Science and Technology Guangdong Ocean University Zhanjiang China.
Jianping ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Product Processing and Safety, College of Food Science and Technology Guangdong Ocean University Zhanjiang China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5685-8581
Saiyi ZhongGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Product Processing and Safety, College of Food Science and Technology Guangdong Ocean University Zhanjiang China.
Guang QiuZhanjiang Yan Tang Dairy Co., Ltd. Zhanjiang China.
Wei ZhangZhanjiang Yan Tang Dairy Co., Ltd. Zhanjiang China.
Ru ChenZhanjiang Yan Tang Dairy Co., Ltd. Zhanjiang China.
Yijun LiuHainan Key Laboratory of Storage & Processing of Fruits and Vegetables, Agricultural Products Processing Research Institute Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences Zhanjiang China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5396-6963
Guangdong Ocean University · CNZhanjiang Experimental Station · CNChinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutathione is an important functional component of 'Haidao 86', which has many important physiological functions in organisms and is widely used in medicine and other industries. In this study, the effects of four extraction methods (hot water extraction, formic acid extraction, ethanol extraction, and sulfuric acid extraction) on the yield of glutathione in 'Haidao 86' germ powders were studied by high-performance liquid chromatography, and the yield of glutathione in hot water extraction was the highest. The effects of material-liquid ratio, temperature, pH, and time on the extraction rate of glutathione from 'Haidao 86' were investigated by single-factor experiment and Box-Behnken combined experiment. The results showed that the order of influence on GSH yield was pH, temperature, material-liquid ratio, and time, and the interaction of extraction time and pH had a significant influence on glutathione yield of 'Haidao 86' germ powders. The optimum parameters for hot water extraction of glutathione from 'Haidao 86' germ powders were determined as follows: material-liquid ratio of 1:12, pH value of 2.8, temperature of 84.9°C, time of 14 min, and the extraction rate of glutathione was 139.68 mg/100 g. It provided the scientific proof for the development and industrial production of functional products of 'Haidao 86'.

Indexed as

extractiongerm powdersglutathioneHaidao 86response surface methodology

Identifiers

PMID37970431
PMCPMC10630831
OpenAlexW4386391939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.