ArticleAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology
The Clinical Outcome in AChR-Positive Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- ACHR-Positive Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: The Old is Gold and the New Is for us to Explore.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
- Clinical Outcomes in AchR Antibody-Positive Myasthenia Gravis: Where Does Rituximab Stand in the Current Times?Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease affecting the neuromuscular junction, and in over 80% of cases, antibodies are identified against the nicotinic type of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) on the muscle endplate. Despite the availability of various treatment options, patients with MG experience relapses and remission during the course of the disease. Aims and Objective: To understand the clinical profile, predictors of outcomes in acetyl choline receptor (AChR) antibody positive generalized MG. Methods: This is a retrospective, single-centre, observational study of 108 patients with AChR positive generalized MG. We collected data on clinical and demographical profiles, treatments received, and treatment responses from those who fulfilled inclusion criteria over a mean follow up period of 33.75 ±7.30 months. Clinical outcomes were studied in terms of the type of remission and crisis or disease exacerbations patients had, considering different variables and treatment received. Results: We found the commonest initial symptoms were ocular or oculo-bulbar, which progressed to generalized MG in the first year of disease onset. 36 (33.3%) patients experienced a crisis requiring mechanical ventilation within a mean period of 9.4 ±4.77 months from the disease onset. Multivariate regression analysis showed late-onset MG (age of onset between 50-70 years) and treatment with rituximab were better correlated with remission, (odd ratio of 4.7; 95 % CI ,1.12 -12.6; Conclusion: In this study of AChR antibody positive generalized MG patients, we found that nearly one-third of them experienced myasthenic crisis despite receiving the best medical care. Rituximab appeared to be effective in the treatment of refractory MG and those who failed thymectomy. Thymectomy was associated with better outcomes in patients, both with or without a thymoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.