ArticleAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Translation and Validation of ID-Migraine Questionnaire to North-Indian Vernacular Languages.
Article in Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Usefulness of the ID-Migraine Screening Tool for Diagnosing Migraines in Patients With Headache and Facial Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of rhinology : official journal of the Korean Rhinologic Society · 2026Review
- The Validation of the Persian Version of the ID-Migraine Questionnaire.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Indian Version of ID-Migraine Questionnaire.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: ID-Migraine is an established screening tool for migraine. Translation and validation in more languages can increase its reach and scope. Aim: To translate and validate ID-Migraine for screening migraine patients in two North-Indian vernacular languages, that is, Hindi and Punjabi. Methods: ID Migraine was translated into Hindi and Punjabi. Subjects with headaches in outpatient clinics were administered the questionnaire according to their preferred language of choice and referenced clinical evaluations, performed by an experienced neurologist, based on current the ICHD-3 diagnostic criteria. Results: One hundred subjects with complaints of headaches and 60 healthy controls were recruited after informed consent. Of the 100 subjects with headaches, 73 (73%) screened positive with a translated version of ID-Migraine, and 60 (60%) were eventually diagnosed with migraine without aura. The sensitivity of the Hindi version of ID-Migraine was 94% (95% confidence intervals, 79% to 99%); specificity, 56% (95% CI, 31% to 78%); positive predictive value, 79% (95% CI, 69% to 86%) and negative predictive value, 83% (95% CI, 55% to 95%). The Punjabi version demonstrated a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI, 68% to 96%); specificity, 43% (95% CI, 23% to 66%); PPV, 68% (95% CI, 58% to 76%); and NPV, 69% (95% CI, 44% to 86%). Conclusion: The translated versions of ID-Migraine demonstrated high sensitivity and fair specificity for screening migraine in Indian subjects who speak and understand Hindi and Punjabi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.