Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37970224›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric cardiology : JGC2023

Drug-coated balloons for the treatment of ostial left anterior descending or ostial left circumflex artery lesions: a patient-level propensity score-matched analysis.

Liang Pan, Wen-Jie Lu, Zhan-Ying Han, San-Cong Pan, Xi Wang, Ying-Guang Shan, Meng Peng, Xiao-Fei Qin, Guo-Ju Sun, Pei-Sheng Zhang and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Drug-Coated Balloons Beyond In-Stent Restenosis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Liang PanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wen-Jie LuDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhan-Ying HanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
San-Cong PanDepartment of Cardiology, Jincheng People's Hospital, Jincheng, China.
Xi WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ying-Guang ShanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Meng PengDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiao-Fei QinDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Guo-Ju SunDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Pei-Sheng ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jian-Zeng DongDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Chun-Guang QiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNFifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNShanxi Jincheng Anthracite Mining Group (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControversy exists as to the optimal treatment approach for ostial left anterior descending (LAD) or ostial left circumflex artery (LCx) lesions. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) may overcome some of the limitations of drug-eluting stents (DES). Therefore, we investigated the security and feasibility of the DCB policy in patients with ostial LAD or ostial LCx lesions, and compared it with the conventional DES-only strategy.

methodsWe retrospectively enrolled patients with

resultsAmong the 397 eligible patients, 6.25% of patients who were planned to undergo DCB underwent DES. A total of 108 patients in each group had comparable propensity scores and were included in the analysis. Two-year target lesion revascularization occurred in 5 patients (4.90%) and 16 patients (16.33%) in the DCB group and the DES group, respectively (odds ratio = 0.264, 95% CI: 0.093-0.752,

conclusionsThe utilization of the DCB approach signifies an innovative and discretionary strategy for managing isolated ostial lesions in the LAD or LCx. Nevertheless, a future randomized trial investigating the feasibility and safety of DCB compared to the DES-only strategy specifically for

Identifiers

PMID37970224
PMCPMC10630168
OpenAlexW4388737356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.