ArticleCJC pediatric and congenital heart disease2023
Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to Indirect Cascade Screening for Familial Hypercholesteraemia in a Paediatric/Parent Population.
Article in CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Childhood: An Overview of Current Practices Around the World.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diagnosis and Screening Strategies for Detection of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Children and Adolescents in Italy: A Survey from the LIPIGEN Paediatric Group.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Treating Familial Hypercholesterolemia: An Insistence on Persistence.JACC. Case reports · 2024Article
- Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The Current State of Its Implementation in Canada.CJC open · 2024Article
- The Power of the Pedigree: Cascade Screening in Familial Hypercholesterolemia.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Cascade Screening in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Achieving Buy-In and Turning Patients Into Partners.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Familial hypercholesteraemia (FH), an inherited disorder of cholesterol metabolism, has a prevalence of 1:250 and an associated 6- to 22-fold increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Despite the prevalence and availability of effective risk-reduction treatments, 90% of at-risk Canadians are undiagnosed. Indirect cascade screening from an index case is useful but the uptake is low (<4%), suggesting that barriers may exist. Using the Theoretical Domains Framework, we sought to determine barriers and facilitators among parents of children diagnosed with FH that may influence the uptake of cascade screening among families. Methods: A qualitative description approach was used for virtual interviews with 10 parents of children with FH, recruited from a regional Lipid Clinic in Toronto, Canada. Semistructured interviews were conducted. The data were analysed using a directed content analysis method. Results: Five interconnecting themes were identified that captured both facilitators and barriers of indirect cascade screening: a high level of knowledge about FH after clinic attendance; parents' surprise of their child's diagnosis and ongoing worry; parents' willingness to communicate the need for cholesterol screening; parents' desire for educational materials, dictated by an external vs internal locus of control; and social and societal influences including the lack of awareness about FH in professional and public domains. Conclusions: The themes identified will inform next steps in programme development. An urgent need was identified for strategies to educate the public and primary care providers about FH and blood cholesterol/genetic screening.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.