Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37970160›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine

Effectiveness of Diabetes Self-Management Education on Distress and HbA1C among Indian Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

M Anjali, Meenakshi Khapre, Ravi Kant, Santosh Kumar, Pragya Pandey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

M AnjaliDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Meenakshi KhapreDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Ravi KantDepartment of Internal Medicine, AIIMS Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Santosh KumarDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Pragya PandeyDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The interrelationship of diabetes with mental illness has increased in recent years. Diabetes-related distress is the emotional burden, stress, and worries associated with diabetes, which does not reach the threshold for depressive disorder. A diabetes self-management education (DSME) is a structured educational approach to improve glycemic control and diabetes-related distress. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of DSME in comparison with usual diabetes care in improving glycemic control and diabetes-related distress. Material and Methods: This is a single-center, parallel randomized controlled trial. A total of 106 participants were recruited for both intervention and control groups with 53 participants each. The control group received only routine outpatient department (OPD) care. The intervention group received DSME in addition to routine OPD care. Diabetes-related distress and HbA1C were assessed after 3 months. The data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Per-protocol analysis was done. Results: Of 127 patients screened, 106 met the eligibility criteria and were randomized. At 3-month follow-up, the reduction in mean HbA1C, fasting blood sugar (FBS), postprandial blood sugar (PPBS), and diabetes distress were significant in the intervention group compared with the control group (p 0.001). The mean HbA1C reduction in the intervention group was significant (mean difference: -1.3, SD: 0.4). The mean DDS had decreased significantly in the intervention group from 2 to 1.2 (mean difference: -0.8, SD: 0.1). Conclusion: The DSME was effective in improving the glycemic control, diabetes-related distress, and self-care among type 2 diabetes (T2DM) mellitus patients.

Indexed as

Diabetes-related distressDSMEHbA1Ctype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID37970160
PMCPMC10637610
OpenAlexW4386544689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.