Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37969890›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2023

Robust and sparse learning of varying coefficient models with high-dimensional features.

Wei Xiong, Maozai Tian, Manlai Tang, Han Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei XiongSchool of Statistics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Maozai TianCenter for Applied Statistics, School of Statistics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0515-4477
Manlai TangDepartment of Mathematics, College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK.
Han PanSchool of Statistics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Varying coefficient model (VCM) is extensively used in various scientific fields due to its capability of capturing the changing structure of predictors. Classical mean regression analysis is often complicated in the existence of skewed, heterogeneous and heavy-tailed data. For this purpose, this work employs the idea of model averaging and introduces a novel comprehensive approach by incorporating quantile-adaptive weights across different quantile levels to further improve both least square (LS) and quantile regression (QR) methods. The proposed procedure that adaptively takes advantage of the heterogeneous and sparse nature of input data can gain more efficiency and be well adapted to extreme event case and high-dimensional setting. Motivated by its nice properties, we develop several robust methods to reveal the dynamic close-to-truth structure for VCM and consistently uncover the zero and nonzero patterns in high-dimensional scientific discoveries. We provide a new iterative algorithm that is proven to be asymptotic consistent and can attain the optimal nonparametric convergence rate given regular conditions. These introduced procedures are highlighted with extensive simulation examples and several real data analyses to further show their stronger predictive power compared with LS, composite quantile regression (CQR) and QR methods.

Indexed as

Model averagingquantile-adaptive weightsquantile varying coefficient modelvariable selection

Identifiers

PMID37969890
PMCPMC10637205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.