Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37969889›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2023

A general class of small area estimation using calibrated hierarchical likelihood approach with applications to COVID-19 data.

Nirosha Rathnayake, Hongying Daisy Dai, Richard Charnigo, Kendra Schmid, Jane Meza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nirosha RathnayakeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Hongying Daisy DaiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Richard CharnigoDepartment of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Kendra SchmidDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Jane MezaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The direct estimation techniques in small area estimation (SAE) models require sufficiently large sample sizes to provide accurate estimates. Hence, indirect model-based methodologies are developed to incorporate auxiliary information. The most commonly used SAE models, including the Fay-Herriot (FH) model and its extended models, are estimated using marginal likelihood estimation and the Bayesian methods, which rely heavily on the computationally intensive integration of likelihood function. In this article, we propose a Calibrated Hierarchical (CH) likelihood approach to obtain SAE through hierarchical estimation of fixed effects and random effects with the regression calibration method for bias correction. The latent random variables at the domain level are treated as 'parameters' and estimated jointly with other parameters of interest. Then the dispersion parameters are estimated iteratively based on the Laplace approximation of the profile likelihood. The proposed method avoids the intractable integration to estimate the marginal distribution. Hence, it can be applied to a wide class of distributions, including generalized linear mixed models, survival analysis, and joint modeling with distinct distributions. We demonstrate our method using an area-level analysis of publicly available count data from the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) positive cases.

Indexed as

bias correctionCOVID-19hierarchicalSmall area estimation

Identifiers

PMID37969889
PMCPMC10637197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.