ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023
The prognostic role of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with a primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a long-term follow-up study.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is one of the common symptoms of GI stromal tumor (GIST). Although several studies have highlighted its prognostic role, conclusions have been inconsistent. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis of GIST patients with GI bleeding. Methods: Primary GIST patients who underwent complete resection and did not receive adjuvant imatinib therapy from January 2003 to December 2008 were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate recurrence-free survival (RFS), and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to reduce confounders. A systematic review of the published articles in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Collaboration, and Medline databases was also conducted, and the inclusion criteria were determined using PICOS (patients, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and study design) principles. Results: In total, 84 patients presenting with GI bleeding and 90 patients without GI bleeding were enrolled in this study. The median time of follow-up was 140 months (range, 10-196 months), and 38 patients developed tumor recurrence/metastasis. For all patients, the multivariate analysis indicated that tumor location [hazard ratio (HR) =3.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.78-6.82, P<0.001], tumor size (HR =1.91, 95% CI: 1.05-3.47, P=0.035), mitotic index (MI; HR =5.69, 95% CI: 2.77-11.67, P<0.001), and age (HR =2.68, 95% CI: 1.49-4.82, P=0.001) were the independent prognostic factors for poor RFS. However, GI bleeding was not associated with RFS (HR =1.21, 95% CI: 0.68-2.14, P=0.518). After PSM, 45 patients from each group were included, and it was found that GI bleeding was still not the independent prognostic factor (HR =1.23, 95% CI: 0.51-2.97, P=0.642). Moreover, the pooled results of our study and six previously reported studies showed that GI bleeding was not the independent prognostic factor (HR =1.45, 95% CI: 0.73-2.86, P=0.287). Conclusions: In this study, tumor location, tumor size, MI, and age were independent prognostic factors in primary GIST patients who underwent radical resection. However, GI bleeding was not associated with worse RFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.