Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37969820›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023

Radiomics based on machine learning algorithms could predict prognosis and postoperative chemotherapy benefits of patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Yilan Xiang, Yuanbo Hu, Chenbin Chen, Huaiqing Zhi, Zhao Zhang, Mingdong Lu, Xietao Chen, Zhixian Luo, Sian Chen, Emmanuel Dias-Neto and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Yilan Xiang *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Yuanbo Hu *Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Chenbin Chen *Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Huaiqing ZhiDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Zhao ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Mingdong LuDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xietao ChenDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Zhixian LuoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Sian ChenDepartment of Emergency, The Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Emmanuel Dias-NetoLaboratory of Medical Genomics, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Paolo PizziniDepartment of Digestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology-IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Xinxin ChenDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xiaodong Chen *Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Yuandi Zhuang *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Qiantong Dong *Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · CNWenzhou Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · CNEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traditional clinical characteristics have certain limitations in evaluating cancer prognosis. The radiomics features provide information on tumor morphology, tissue texture, and hemodynamics, which can accurately reflect personalized predictions. This study investigated the clinical value of radiomics features on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images in predicting prognosis and postoperative chemotherapy benefits for patients with gastric cancer (GC). Methods: For this study, 171 GC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy and pathology confirmation of the malignancy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University were retrospectively enrolled. The general information, pathological characteristics, and postoperative chemotherapy information were collected. Patients were also monitored through telephone interviews or outpatient treatment. GC patients were randomly divided into the developing cohort (n=120) and validation cohort (n=51). The intra-tumor areas of interest inside the tumors were delineated, and 1,218 radiomics features were extracted. The optimal radiomics risk score (RRS) was constructed using 8 machine learning algorithms and 29 algorithm combinations. Furthermore, a radiomics nomogram that included clinicopathological characteristics was constructed and validated through univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. Results: Eleven prognosis-related features were selected, and an RRS was constructed. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that the RRS had a high prognostic ability in the developing and validation cohorts (log-rank P<0.01). The RRS was higher in patients with a larger tumor size (≥3 cm), higher Charlson score (≥2), and higher clinical stage (Stages III and IV) (all P<0.001). Furthermore, GC patients with a higher RRS significantly benefited from postoperative chemotherapy. The results of univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrated that the RRS was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P<0.001). A visual nomogram was established based on the significant factors in multivariate Cox analysis (P<0.05). The C-index was 0.835 (0.793-0.877) for OS and 0.733 (0.677-0.789) for DFS in the developing cohort. The calibration curve also showed that the nomogram had good agreement. Conclusions: A nomogram that combines the RRS and clinicopathological characteristics could serve as a novel noninvasive preoperative prediction model with the potential to accurately predict the prognosis and chemotherapy benefits of GC patients.

Indexed as

computed tomography (CT)Gastric cancer (GC)machine learning algorithmspostoperative chemotherapyradiomics risk score (RRS)

Identifiers

PMID37969820
PMCPMC10643584
OpenAlexW4388157716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.