Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37969817›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023

Comparison of transarterial bland embolization and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for very early and early hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable for surgery or ablation: a single center retrospective data analysis.

Marionna Cathomas, Flavian Mueller, Nando Mertineit, Iris Baumgartner, Daniel Candinas, Annalisa Berzigotti, Martin H Maurer, Anja Lachenmayer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marionna CathomasDepartment of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Flavian MuellerDepartment of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Nando MertineitDepartment of Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Iris BaumgartnerDepartment of Angiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Daniel CandinasDepartment of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Annalisa BerzigottiDepartment of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Martin H MaurerDepartment of Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Anja LachenmayerDepartment of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHCarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the accepted therapy for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although recent data suggests that bland transarterial embolization (TAE) is equally effective in intermediate HCC, not much is known about the efficacy in very early and early HCC not amenable for ablation or resection. We aimed to compare the outcome of patients with very early and early HCC treated by drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE), a specific technique of TACE using DC beads, and TAE using microparticles with a size of 100 µm up to 700 µm. Methods: Clinical data of totally 95 patients with very early and early HCC not amenable for surgery or ablation, treated between 2009 and 2019 at the Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine and the Interdisciplinary Center of Vascular Interventions, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland, were retrospectively analyzed (52 patients in DEB-TACE and 42 patients in TAE group, respectively). All images were assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were local response rate and time to local progression. Results: Most patients presented with Child-Pugh A. Thrombocytes were significantly lower in patients treated by TAE. Minor side effects occurred equally in both groups. No differences were detected in terms of OS, local tumor recurrence and response rate. Conclusions: Compared with DEB-TACE, TAE is an equally effective and save therapy for very early and early HCC not amenable for resection or ablation without differences in local tumor control and OS.

Indexed as

bland embolizationdrug-eluting transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)transarterial embolization (TAE)

Identifiers

PMID37969817
PMCPMC10643597
OpenAlexW4388157113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.