ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2023
Malignant priapism: case report and update on management protocols.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Malignant Priapism as the Sole Initial Manifestation of Metastatic Carcinoma with Suspected Pulmonary Origin: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Painful penile erection as a manifestation of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- A Case of Malignant Priapism Secondary to Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer and Review of Palliative Management.Case reports in urology · 2025Article
- Case report: Malignant priapism: penile metastasis from prostate cancer with low serum PSA level.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malignant priapism, a rare disease with only about 500 reported cases to date, consists of persistent erection secondary to invasion or metastasis of a primary neoplasm. While treatment guidelines for priapism in non-malignant cases have been established, there is currently no guideline for treating malignant priapism. Herein, we describe three cases of malignant priapism and suggest a step-by-step approach for clinical management. Case Description: This study reports three cases of malignant priapism resulting from advanced genitourinary cancers. All patients experienced a sub-acute progression of penile pain and ultimately underwent palliative penectomy, resulting in sustained symptom relief. Conclusions: Treatment of malignant priapism needs to be individualized to the needs of the patient. No matter the primary or secondary nature of the disease, current data suggest that malignant priapism is associated with poor outcomes and emphasis should be put on palliative care. Similar to previous cases, our cases died shortly after the diagnosis of malignant priapism. Conventional procedures such as shunting may not necessarily provide symptom relief in these patients. Although new radiation techniques have shown favorable outcomes, penectomy should be considered the last resort in clinical management. Revisions to the existing management guidelines for priapism are necessary to address its occurrence in malignant contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.