ArticleActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2023
Erratum: Author correction to "Coordinated regulation of BACH1 and mitochondrial metabolism through tumor targeted self-assembled nanoparticles for effective triple negative breast cancer combination therapy" [Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 12 (2022) 3934-3951].
Article in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Solvent-controlled Rh-catalysed hydrodehalogenation and construction of phenanthridinone skeleton from a common precursor in one-step sequence and the antitumor activity of its derivatives.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.06.009.].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.