Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37969710›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2023

Systematic review of diagnostic tools for peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer-staging laparoscopy and its alternatives.

Si Ying Adelina Ho, Kon Voi Tay

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Diagnostic performance of staging laparoscopy after chemotherapy and the prognostic impact of peritoneal disease resolution in advanced gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinicopathologic features and prognostic impact of late recurrence after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Si Ying Adelina HoLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore 308232, Singapore. aho016@e.ntu.edu.sg.
Kon Voi TayUpper GI and Bariatric Division, General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore.
Singapore Management University · SGTan Tock Seng Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer burden and mortality, often resulting in peritoneal metastasis in advanced stages with negative survival outcomes. Staging laparoscopy has become standard practice for suspected cases before a definitive gastrectomy or palliation. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of other diagnostic modalities instead of staging laparoscopy as the alternatives are able to reduce cost and invasive staging procedures. Recently, a radiomic model based on computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) has also emerged as another method to predict peritoneal metastasis.

aimTo determine if the efficacy of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and PET is comparable with staging laparoscopy.

methodsArticles comparing computed tomography, PET, magnetic resonance imaging, and radiomic models based on computed tomography and PET to staging laparoscopies were filtered out from the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and

resultsStaging laparoscopy outperformed computed tomography in all measured aspects, namely sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Magnetic resonance imaging and PET produced mixed results, with the former shown to be only marginally better than computed tomography. CT performed slightly better than PET in most measured domains, except in specificity and true negative rates. We speculate that this may be due to the limited F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in small peritoneal metastases and in linitis plastica. Radiomic modelling, in its current state, shows promise as an alternative for predicting peritoneal metastases. With further research, deep learning and radiomic modelling can be refined and potentially applied as a preoperative diagnostic tool to reduce the need for invasive staging laparoscopy.

conclusionStaging laparoscopy was superior in all measured aspects. However, associated risks and costs must be considered. Refinements in radiomic modelling are necessary to establish it as a reliable screening technique.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyGastric cancerMagnetic resonance imagingPeritoneal metastasesPositron emission tomographyStaging laparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID37969710
PMCPMC10642463
OpenAlexW4388194911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.