ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Radiogenomics of adult intracranial gliomas after the 2021 World Health Organisation classification: a review of changes, challenges and opportunities.
Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glioma Segmentation on Multicenter 2D-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Low-Rank Adaptation Tuning of a Foundation Model: An External Test Evaluation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- A three-classification machine learning model for non-invasive prediction of molecular subtypes in diffuse glioma: a two-center study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Reply.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Correlating MRI features with additional genetic markers and patient survival in histological grade 2-3 IDH-mutant astrocytomas.Neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Apparent diffusion coefficient for genetic characterization of untreated adult gliomas: A meta-analysis stratified by methods.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The classification of diffuse gliomas has undergone substantial changes over the last decade, starting with the 2016 World Health Organisation (WHO) classification, which introduced the importance of molecular markers for glioma diagnosis, in particular, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status and 1p/19-codeletion. This has spurred research into the correlation of imaging features with the key molecular markers, known as "radiogenomics" or "imaging genomics". Radiogenomics has a variety of possible benefits, including supplementing immunohistochemistry to refine the histological diagnosis and overcoming some of the limitations of the histological assessment. The recent 2021 WHO classification has introduced a variety of changes and continues the trend of increasing the importance of molecular markers in the diagnosis. Key changes include a formal distinction between adult- and paediatric-type diffuse gliomas, the addition of new diagnostic entities, refinements to the nomenclature for IDH-mutant (IDH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.