Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37969634›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

An artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis modeling software (AIMS) platform based on medical images and machine learning: a development and validation study.

Zhiyong Zhou, Xusheng Qian, Jisu Hu, Guangqiang Chen, Caiyuan Zhang, Jianbing Zhu, Yakang Dai

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhiyong Zhou *Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Xusheng Qian *Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Jisu HuSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Guangqiang ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Caiyuan ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jianbing ZhuSuzhou Science & Technology Town Hospital, Suzhou Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Suzhou, China.
Yakang DaiSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Supervised machine learning methods [both radiomics and convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning] are usually employed to develop artificial intelligence models with medical images for computer-assisted diagnosis and prognosis of diseases. A classical machine learning-based modeling workflow involves a series of interconnected components and various algorithms, but this makes it challenging, tedious, and labor intensive for radiologists and researchers to build customized models for specific clinical applications if they lack expertise in machine learning methods. Methods: We developed a user-friendly artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis modeling software (AIMS) platform, which supplies standardized machine learning-based modeling workflows for computer-assisted diagnosis and prognosis systems with medical images. In contrast to other existing software platforms, AIMS contains both radiomics and CNN-based deep learning workflows, making it an all-in-one software platform for machine learning-based medical image analysis. The modular design of AIMS allows users to build machine learning models easily, test models comprehensively, and fairly compare the performance of different models in a specific application. The graphical user interface (GUI) enables users to process large numbers of medical images without programming or script addition. Furthermore, AIMS also provides a flexible image processing toolkit (e.g., semiautomatic segmentation, registration, morphological operations) to rapidly create lesion labels for multiphase analysis, multiregion analysis of an individual tumor (e.g., tumor mass and peritumor), and multimodality analysis. Results: The functionality and efficiency of AIMS were demonstrated in 3 independent experiments in radiation oncology, where multiphase, multiregion, and multimodality analyses were performed, respectively. For clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) Fuhrman grading with multiphase analysis (sample size =187), the area under the curve (AUC) value of the AIMS was 0.776; for ccRCC Fuhrman grading with multiregion analysis (sample size =177), the AUC value of the AIMS was 0.848; for prostate cancer Gleason grading with multimodality analysis (sample size =206), the AUC value of the AIMS was 0.980. Conclusions: AIMS provides a user-friendly infrastructure for radiologists and researchers, lowering the barrier to building customized machine learning-based computer-assisted diagnosis models for medical image analysis.

Indexed as

deep learningMachine learningmedical image analysisradiomicssoftware

Identifiers

PMID37969634
PMCPMC10644131
OpenAlexW4387961990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.