ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Unsupervised domain adaptation for automated knee osteoarthritis phenotype classification.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Deep Learning and Foundation Model Embeddings for Osteoarthritis Feature Classification in Knee Radiographs.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Automated knee MRI segmentation with KneeSeg-U for cartilage and bone extraction using an unsupervised deep learning framework.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Advancing deep learning based knee cartilage segmentation in MRI: Innovations, challenges and applications.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a global healthcare problem. The increasing population of OA patients demands a greater bandwidth of imaging and diagnostics. It is important to provide automatic and objective diagnostic techniques to address this challenge. This study demonstrates the utility of unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) for automated OA phenotype classification. Methods: We collected 318 and 960 three-dimensional double-echo steady-state magnetic resonance images from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) dataset as the source dataset for phenotype cartilage/meniscus and subchondral bone, respectively. Fifty three-dimensional turbo spin echo (TSE)/fast spin echo (FSE) MR images from our institute were collected as the target datasets. For each patient, the degree of knee OA was initially graded according to the MRI Knee Osteoarthritis Knee Score before being converted to binary OA phenotype labels. The proposed four-step UDA pipeline included (I) pre-processing, which involved automatic segmentation and region-of-interest cropping; (II) source classifier training, which involved pre-training a convolutional neural network (CNN) encoder for phenotype classification using the source dataset; (III) target encoder adaptation, which involved unsupervised adjustment of the source encoder to the target encoder using both the source and target datasets; and (IV) target classifier validation, which involved statistical analysis of the classification performance evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. We compared our model on the target data with the source pre-trained model and the model trained with the target data from scratch. Results: For phenotype cartilage/meniscus, our model has the best performance out of the three models, giving 0.90 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-1.02] of the AUROC score, while the other two model show 0.52 (95% CI: 0.13-0.90) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.53-0.98). For phenotype subchondral bone, our model gave 0.75 (95% CI: 0.56-0.94) at AUROC, which has a close performance of the source pre-trained model (0.76, 95% CI: 0.55-0.98), and better than the model trained from scratch on the target dataset only (0.53, 95% CI: 0.33-0.73). Conclusions: By utilising a large, high-quality source dataset for training, the proposed UDA approach enhances the performance of automated OA phenotype classification for small target datasets. As a result, our technique enables improved downstream analysis of locally collected datasets with a small sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.