Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37969616›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in pharmacy practice

Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Two Different Doses of Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Somayeh Sadeghi, Nima Arezoomandi, Marzieh Mollaei Ardestani, Mohammad Emami Ardestani, Farzin Ghiasi, Ziba Farajzadegan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Somayeh SadeghiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Acquired Immunodeficiency Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical, Isfahan, Iran.
Nima ArezoomandiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran.
Marzieh Mollaei ArdestaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad Emami ArdestaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran.
Farzin GhiasiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran.
Ziba FarajzadeganDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Child Growth and Development Research Center, Research Institute for Primordial Prevention of Non-Communicable Disease, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
University of Isfahan · IRIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The current study aims to investigate high- versus low-dose dexamethasone administration to control the disease with minor complications. Methods: The current multicentric randomized clinical trial was conducted on 119 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and assigned into two groups of low-dose (8 mg daily intravenous dose for at least 7 days or until discharge) ( Findings: Oxygen saturation, Borg scale, and C-reactive protein levels were significantly altered by the time in both the groups ( Conclusion: According to this study, low- versus high-dose dexamethasone therapy did not affect the outcomes, so low-dose dexamethasone is recommended for COVID-19 pneumonia to achieve optimal results and prevent potential adverse events.

Indexed as

COVID-19Dexamethasonehigh doselow doseviral pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID37969616
PMCPMC10642588
OpenAlexW4386235495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.