Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37969558›Full record

ArticleCJC pediatric and congenital heart disease2022

Canadian Developmental Follow-up Practices in Children With Congenital Heart Defects: A National Environmental Scan.

Marie-Eve Bolduc, Janet E Rennick, Isabelle Gagnon, Annette Majnemer, Marie Brossard-Racine

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marie-Eve BolducSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Janet E RennickDepartment of Nursing, The Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Isabelle GagnonSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Annette MajnemerSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Marie Brossard-RacineSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
McGill University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAMontreal Children's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Developmental follow-up is central to the timely identification of delays in at-risk children. Throughout Canada, data are currently lacking on the follow-up of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) after open-heart surgery. The objective of this study was to describe current Canadian developmental follow-up practices and to explore barriers to optimal follow-up. Methods: A cross-sectional study was implemented with health professionals involved with the developmental follow-up of children with CHD in the 8 specialized hospitals that perform pediatric open-heart surgery in Canada. A questionnaire collected descriptive information about the setting and current follow-up practices. In addition, an interview was conducted to explore what would be considered optimal developmental follow-up in Canada and identify potential barriers. Results: Four of the 8 tertiary care centres had a systematic developmental follow-up program that included screening and formal evaluation. These programs were only accessible to a subset of children with CHD identified to be at higher risk. Participants described current practices as suboptimal and aimed to develop a more systematic developmental follow-up program or expand an existing one. Participants emphasized the lack of human resources, financial supports, and limited dedicated time as major barriers to offering optimal follow-up care. Conclusions: Current follow-up practices in Canada are considered suboptimal by health care specialists involved in treating children with CHD. These practices may fail to promptly identify children and adolescents with CHD who have developmental challenges. It is essential that we develop national recommendations to optimize the developmental follow-up practices in Canada for this high-risk population.

Identifiers

PMID37969558
PMCPMC10642138
OpenAlexW4210964039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.