Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37969395›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2023

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of apatinib plus etoposide versus apatinib alone for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: protocol of a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 trial.

Zhiguo Hou, Chunyan Lan, Xin Huang, Rosa A Salcedo-Hernández, Sally El-Tawab

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04383977 (A Phase 2 Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Trial of Apatinib and Etoposide Capsule Versus Apatinib in Patients With Platinum Resistant or Refractory Ovarian Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04383977 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Phase 2 Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Trial of Apatinib and Etoposide Capsule Versus Apatinib in Patients With Platinum Resistant or Refractory Ovarian Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorJiangsu HengRui Medicine Co., Ltd.Ran2020 to 2021Enrolled54ConditionsOvarian CancerArmsApatinib and Etoposide capsule, Apatinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhiguo Hou *Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Chunyan Lan *Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Xin HuangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Rosa A Salcedo-HernándezGynecological Cancers Division, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de México (Mexico's National Cancer Institute), Mexico City, Mexico.
Sally El-TawabOxford Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Currently preferred single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy or its combination with bevacizumab results in a low response rate and modest survival benefit for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer, and thus more effective regimens are needed. In our previous phase 2 trial, apatinib plus etoposide showed promising efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Due to the single-arm design, the role of apatinib still needs to be determined. Methods: In this phase 2 trial, 54 adult patients with platinum-resistant current ovarian cancer will be recruited at 17 sites in China. Patients with prior administration of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors or etoposide will be excluded. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive apatinib (375 mg, orally, once daily) alone or in combination with etoposide (50 mg, orally on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle) until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Randomization will be performed using a computerized central randomization system, stratified by platinum resistance for the first time (yes or no). Imaging examinations will be conducted every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (version 1.1), which will be compared between groups using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Discussion: This study will provide prospective data of 2 experimental regimens using a randomized design. It will help determine whether apatinib monotherapy can provide favorable clinical benefits or needs to be combined with chemotherapy to be effective. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04383977. It was registered on May 12, 2020.

Indexed as

Apatinibetoposideovarian cancerplatinumprotocol

Identifiers

PMID37969395
PMCPMC10643946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.