ArticleTranslational cancer research2023
Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of apatinib plus etoposide versus apatinib alone for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: protocol of a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 trial.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04383977 (A Phase 2 Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Trial of Apatinib and Etoposide Capsule Versus Apatinib in Patients With Platinum Resistant or Refractory Ovarian Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2 Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Trial of Apatinib and Etoposide Capsule Versus Apatinib in Patients With Platinum Resistant or Refractory Ovarian Cancer
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A real-world retrospective cohort study: the clinical outcomes and characteristics of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently preferred single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy or its combination with bevacizumab results in a low response rate and modest survival benefit for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer, and thus more effective regimens are needed. In our previous phase 2 trial, apatinib plus etoposide showed promising efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Due to the single-arm design, the role of apatinib still needs to be determined. Methods: In this phase 2 trial, 54 adult patients with platinum-resistant current ovarian cancer will be recruited at 17 sites in China. Patients with prior administration of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors or etoposide will be excluded. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive apatinib (375 mg, orally, once daily) alone or in combination with etoposide (50 mg, orally on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle) until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Randomization will be performed using a computerized central randomization system, stratified by platinum resistance for the first time (yes or no). Imaging examinations will be conducted every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (version 1.1), which will be compared between groups using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Discussion: This study will provide prospective data of 2 experimental regimens using a randomized design. It will help determine whether apatinib monotherapy can provide favorable clinical benefits or needs to be combined with chemotherapy to be effective. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04383977. It was registered on May 12, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.