ArticleTranslational cancer research2023
Survival trends and conditional survival in primary non-metastatic esophageal cancer: a SEER population-based study and external validation.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic outcomes of different treatment approaches for T1a-M3/T1b esophageal cancer and development of a prognostic prediction model.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics, prognosis, and nomogram for upper esophageal cancer: a SEER database analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The dynamic survival trend of patients with primary non-metastatic esophageal cancer (nMEC) is unknown. We conducted a conditional survival (CS) analysis and developed a novel nomogram to predict it. Methods: Patients with primary nMEC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Independent prognostic factors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) were identified. The log-rank test and Cox analysis were used to calculate probabilities of CS. We constructed nomograms to predict survival trends and CS probabilities based on the prognostic factors. Calibration curves and C-indexes were used for internal and external validation. Results: A total of 9,008 patients were identified from the SEER database and 37 patients were recruited as an external validation cohort. The 1- and 3-year CS rates were 69.6% and 43.1% at diagnosis, rising to 95.2% and 86.2% at the fifth conditional year. CS probabilities by different variables continuously improved over time. The calibration curves of the CS nomograms fit well. The C-indexes were 0.700 (95% CI: 0.693-0.709) in the training cohort, 0.693 (95% CI: 0.669-0.717) in the internal validation cohort, and 0.683 (95% CI: 0.556-0.810) in the external validation cohort. Conclusions: CS rates are more dynamic than traditional survival rates for patients surviving for a relatively longer period. The CS rates of patients with nMEC improved over time and became stable after surviving for a few years. We developed and validated nomograms to predict CS probabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.