ArticleTranslational cancer research2023
SMIM20: a new biological signal associated with the prognosis of glioblastoma.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined effects of escitalopram and vitamin E on phoenixin-20 secretion and neuroregulatory mechanisms in glioblastoma cells: a neuro-nutritional perspective.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Hsp70 and Calcitonin Receptor Protein in Extracellular Vesicles from Glioblastoma Multiforme: Biomarkers with Putative Roles in Carcinogenesis and Potential for Differentiating Tumor Types.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most prevalent fatal central nervous system tumor. Notably, the survival rates after surgical intervention and active radiotherapy are not optimistic. Therefore, identifying new GBM-related biomarkers is a top priority in current research. Methods: Transcriptome and clinical information of patients with GBM were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases. According to the SMIM20 expression levels, the samples were divided into high- and low-expression groups and used for differential expression gene (DEG) analysis. Functional enrichment analyses, including Gene Ontology (GO), gene set enrichment analysis, and immune cell infiltration, were performed on SMIM20-related DEGs. Subsequently, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to screen the risk factors associated with the poor prognosis of SMIM20, and the clinical significance of SMIM20 in GBM was explored by constructing a prognostic nomogram. Results: In total, 156 DEGs were screened, of which 131 were upregulated and 25 were downregulated. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the total survival time of the SMIM20 high expression group was significantly lower than that of the SMIM20 low-expression group. Finally, the nomogram map had good predictive value for evaluating GBM prognosis of patients. Conclusions: High expression of SMIM20 is associated with poor outcomes in GBM. The DEGs and pathways identified in this study reveal potential molecular mechanisms underlying the occurrence and progression of GBM. Our study identifies potential new biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the treatment of GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.