ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023
Relationship between pulmonary blood flow and volume following lung resection using dynamic perfusion digital radiography.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary vascular changes after lung resection: why less may be more.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Review
- Review
- Standardization of image quality in dynamic chest radiography: a determination procedure of individualized exposure settings based on the data from plain chest radiography.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical intervention for lung resection can cause ventilation-perfusion mismatches and affect gas exchange; however, minimally invasive assessment of blood flow is difficult. This study aimed to evaluate changes in pulmonary blood flow after radical lung cancer surgery using a minimally invasive dynamic digital chest radiography system. Methods: We evaluated 64 patients who underwent radical lobectomies. Postoperative changes in pulmonary blood flow, assessed using dynamic chest radiography-based blood flow ratios (BFRs), were compared with the temporal evolution of both functional lung volumes (FLVs) and estimated lung weight (ELW) derived from computed tomography (CT) volumetry. Results: FLVs on the affected side gradually recovered over time from the lowest value observed 3 months after surgery in all procedures. BFRs on the affected side also showed a gradual recovery from the lowest value 1 month after surgery, except for left upper lobectomies (LULs). In LULs, FLVs and ELWs increased proportionally up to 3 months after surgery, with lung volumes continuing to increase thereafter. The recovery of BFRs differed depending on the resected lobe. Conclusions: A relationship between pulmonary blood flow and FLV was observed in the postoperative period. Despite varying compensatory responses depending on the surgical procedure, FLV recovery coincided with increased pulmonary blood flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.