Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37969266›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2023

A narrative review on the management of patients awaiting lung transplantation in Japan.

Hidemi Suzuki, Ichiro Yoshino

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07660991 (Pulmoner Rehabilitasyon Alan akciğer Nakil adaylarında hidroksimetilbütirat Takviyesinin değerlendirilmesi), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07660991 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Pulmoner Rehabilitasyon Alan akciğer Nakil adaylarında hidroksimetilbütirat Takviyesinin değerlendirilmesi

TypeinterventionalSponsorOkan UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsLung Transplantation, Pulmoner Rehabilitation, Lun Transplant CandidatesArmsHMB
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hidemi SuzukiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Ichiro YoshinoDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: The number of lung transplantations performed in Japan is increasing, and post-transplant outcomes are relatively favorable. A major concern is the extremely long waiting time and the high mortality rate on the waitlist. The management of patients before transplantation is very important and essential for further improvement of outcomes. In this review, we summarize the management of patients awaiting lung transplantation in Japan. Methods: A literature search was conducted via PubMed in November 2022 using the following keywords: lung transplantation, waiting, management, recipient, and Japan. Peer-reviewed academic journal articles published in English were also included. Key Content and Findings: A growing number of studies have evaluated the management of pre-transplant patients. This includes infection control, vaccination, respiratory disease-specific treatment, malignancy, nutrition, rehabilitation, psychosocial assessment, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for patients on the waitlist. Each is important, and various evaluation methods and strategies to improve outcomes have been reported. Conclusions: Proper and multifaceted management of pretransplant patients is extremely important to reduce the mortality of candidates for lung transplantation. Integrated management is crucial to the success and survival of lung transplant recipients.

Indexed as

JapanLung transplantationmanagementrecipient

Identifiers

PMID37969266
PMCPMC10636442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.