ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023
Diagnostic performance of a deep learning-based method in differentiating malignant from benign subcentimeter (≤10 mm) solid pulmonary nodules.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Standalone deep learning versus experts for diagnosis lung cancer on chest computed tomography: a systematic review.European radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Noninvasive differentiation of benign and malignant solid pulmonary nodules using multiparameter dual-layer spectral CT radiomics.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- The role of growth heterogeneity in solid nodular non-small cell lung cancer in clinical practice: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Radiomics-machine learning model for predicting invasiveness of subcentimeter subsolid lung adenocarcinoma: a validation study with external cohort and SHAP interpretability.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Influencing factors and prediction of growth heterogeneity in solid nodule non-small cell lung cancer based on artificial intelligence: a prospective study.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Mapping the research trends and hotspots on solid pulmonary nodules from 2000-2024: insights from bibliometric analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Development and validation of CT radiomics diagnostic models: differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules and evaluating malignancy degree.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Effect of respiratory phase on three-dimensional quantitative parameters of pulmonary subsolid nodules in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Development of a clinical prediction model for benign and malignant pulmonary nodules with a CTR ≥ 50% utilizing artificial intelligence-driven radiomics analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study assessed the diagnostic performance of a deep learning (DL)-based model for differentiating malignant subcentimeter (≤10 mm) solid pulmonary nodules (SSPNs) from benign ones in computed tomography (CT) images compared against radiologists with 10 and 15 years of experience in thoracic imaging (medium-senior seniority). Methods: Overall, 200 SSPNs (100 benign and 100 malignant) were retrospectively collected. Malignancy was confirmed by pathology, and benignity was confirmed by follow-up or pathology. CT images were fed into the DL model to obtain the probability of malignancy (range, 0-100%) for each nodule. According to the diagnostic results, enrolled nodules were classified into benign, malignant, or indeterminate. The accuracy and diagnostic composition of the model were compared with those of the radiologists using the McNemar-Bowker test. Enrolled nodules were divided into 3-6-, 6-8-, and 8-10-mm subgroups. For each subgroup, the diagnostic results of the model were compared with those of the radiologists. Results: The accuracy of the DL model, in differentiating malignant and benign SSPNs, was significantly higher than that of the radiologists (71.5% Conclusions: The DL-based method yielded higher performance in comparison with that of the radiologists in differentiating malignant and benign SSPNs. This DL model may reduce uncertainty in diagnosis and improve diagnostic accuracy, especially for SSPNs smaller than 8 mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.