Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37969248›Full record

ArticleOpen research Europe2023

Addressing disparities in European Social Sciences & Humanities research on climate, energy and mobility: insights from a Call for Evidence survey and analysis workshops on the challenges and opportunities of working in Southern and Central & Eastern Europe.

Chris Foulds, Ami Crowther, Alevgul H Sorman, Violeta Cabello, Dóra Bálint, Gergely Tagai, Viktor Varjú, Rosie Robison, Ester Galende Sánchez, Kristina Zindulková

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open research Europe, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chris FouldsGlobal Sustainability Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, England, CB1 1PT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-5904
Ami CrowtherGlobal Sustainability Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, England, CB1 1PT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9600-2243
Alevgul H SormanBasque Center for Climate Change, Bilbao, Basque Country, 48940, Spain.
Violeta CabelloBasque Center for Climate Change, Bilbao, Basque Country, 48940, Spain.
Dóra BálintInstitute for Regional Studies, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Pécs, 7621, Hungary.
Gergely TagaiInstitute for Regional Studies, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Pécs, 7621, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-4355
Viktor VarjúInstitute for Regional Studies, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Pécs, 7621, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3954-4518
Rosie RobisonGlobal Sustainability Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, England, CB1 1PT, UK.
Ester Galende SánchezBasque Center for Climate Change, Bilbao, Basque Country, 48940, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8558-038X
Kristina ZindulkováBasque Center for Climate Change, Bilbao, Basque Country, 48940, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the efforts of the EU, disparities remain in terms of the participation of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) researchers from both Southern and Central & Eastern Europe in research collaborations, as compared to Northern and Western European scholars. To better understand these disparities, the EU Horizon Europe SSH CENTRE project ran a Call for Evidence over December 2022 to March 2023. Specifically, respondents were asked about the challenges they faced in conducting SSH research on climate, energy and/or mobility, as well as the ways in which these challenges could be addressed. The Call's online survey was focused on maximising diversity, and it gathered views and experiences of 137 Southern and Central & Eastern European SSH researchers. The sample was balanced across genders (71 men, 66 women) and the three main themes (82 energy, 88 climate, 53 mobility), and included at least one respondent from each of the 27 target countries. The highest numbers of respondents were from Hungary (19) and Spain (21). To ensure that interpretation and analysis of the data was grounded in regional contexts, we ran two parallel analysis workshops hosted in a hybrid format (combining online and in-person participants): one in Pécs for Central & Eastern European SSH researchers (34 participants); and one in Bilbao for Southern European SSH researchers (26 participants). These workshops focused on discussing the relationship between SSH-STEM disciplines, analysing the institutional contexts, and discussing the implications for domestic and EU research funding relations. During the workshops, data collected through the survey were collectively analysed and the most important reflections were gathered into a common structure of 'Challenges' and 'Ways forward'. Key messages from the workshop are being distilled into a Position Statement that focuses on the common elements while also emphasising possible differences between Southern and Central & Eastern Europe.

Indexed as

Career pathwaysFragmentationFundingMixed methods.Research and innovation policyResearch geographiesUniversities

Identifiers

PMID37969248
PMCPMC10646341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.