ArticleHawai'i journal of health & social welfare2023
Rapid Cycle Quality Improvement of Telemedicine Protocols in a Skilled Nursing Facility During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Key informants' perceptions of telehealth palliative care for people living with dementia in nursing homes.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was not well adopted in US nursing facilities. Many nursing facilities have since acknowledged its value due to the need for stricter infection control and reduction of exposure risk from face-to-face visits. A quality improvement project was conducted to improve telemedicine protocols in a high-volume post-acute care nursing facility, enhance provider and facility capability for visits, improve attitudes and skills toward telemedicine, and expand patient access to medical care during the pandemic. Process improvement was facilitated through identifying core areas of need and implementing interventions to address them. Project impact was measured by a retrospective pre-post survey of 7 questions to evaluate process improvement, attitudes, skills, and perceptions using a 5-point Likert scale (5=strongly agree, 1=strongly disagree) completed by 22 respondents (8 medical providers and 14 staff). Scores from before and after implementation were compared using paired t-tests. Respondents expressed improvement in perceived value (3.2 vs 4.8), personal skill/efficiency (2.3 vs 4.2), comfort level (2.3 vs 4.5), and scheduling process (2.3 vs 3.9) for telemedicine visits (all P≤.001). Respondents expressed increased awareness of barriers/benefits of telemedicine (2.8 vs 4.7, P<.001) and improved leadership commitment (2.6 vs 4.4, P<.001). The weekly average number of telemedicine visits per respondent increased significantly after protocol implementation (6.5 vs 25.6, P=.002). With support of facility leadership, interdisciplinary team members and engagement of key stakeholders, a telemedicine protocol was implemented in a single, high-volume, post-acute care skilled nursing facility during the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing patients to receive needed care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37969237PMC10630537W4388737377What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.