ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound for assessing posterior pelvic injury and prolapse in postpartum women.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interpregnancy Interval and the Degree of Cystocele Across Two Vaginal Deliveries: A Retrospective Self-Controlled Cohort Study Using Transperineal Ultrasound.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Magnetomyographic assessment of pelvic floor muscles compared to ultrasound during pregnancy.Physiological reports · 2025Article
- Application of transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound in postpartum pelvic organ injury and prolapse in women.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the association between transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound findings and posterior pelvic injury and prolapse in postpartum women.
methodsA total of 108 postpartum women received treatment from January 2020 and December 2022 were divided into 2 groups, with 53 cases in a pelvic floor disorder (PFD) group and 55 cases in the no PFD group according to whether they developed PFD after delivery. The relationship between ultrasound data and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) scores was analyzed by Pearson correlation. The diagnostic value of transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound for PFD was analyzed by using the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the relationship between transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound parameters and PFD was analyzed by using the RR hazard ratio.
resultsThe distance from the bladder neck to the posterior inferior border of the pubic symphysis, the distance from the cervix to the posterior inferior border of the pubic symphysis, and the shortening rate during retraction were shorter or lower in the PFD group than those in the no PFD group. Additionally, bladder descent, cervical subluxation, urethral rotation, anterior and posterior diameters of the static levator ani muscle (LAM), anterior and posterior diameters of the retracted LAM, anterior and posterior diameters of the LAM in the maximal Valsalva maneuver, and PFDI-20 scores in the PFD group were longer or higher than those of the no PFD group (P<0.01). Shortening rate during retraction, bladder descent, cervical subluxation, urethral rotation, and elongation at maximal Valsalva maneuver were positively correlated with the PFDI-20 score (R = 0.027, 0.053, 0.102, 0.002, 0.011, 0.123, respectively, all P<0.05).
conclusionsThe degree of bladder descent, cervical subluxation, urethral rotation, shortening rate during retraction, and elongation at maximal Valsalva maneuver are closely related to the PFD I-20 score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37969208PMC10641346W4388737019What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.