ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Epalrestat is effective in treating diabetic foot infection and can lower serum inflammatory factors in patients.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was designed to determine the efficacy of epalrestat on patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) and its effects on serum inflammatory factors in the patients.
methodsThe data of 80 patients with DFI treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi Medical College from May 2020 to May 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, patients who received routine comprehensive treatment were enrolled into the control group (n=37), and those who received epalrestat on the basis of routine comprehensive treatment were enrolled into the study group (n=43). The changes of serum inflammatory factors before and after treatment, granulation tissue grading and efficacy in the two groups were analyzed and compared, and the wound healing time, hospitalization time and adverse reactions (including nausea and vomiting, dizziness, headache, pruritus, etc.) of the two groups were statistically analyzed. The prognosis of the patients within 1 year after treatment was analyzed, and the independent risk factors of poor prognosis were analyzed through logistic regression.
resultsBefore treatment, the two groups were not significantly different in the levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), while after treatment, the levels decreased significantly in both groups, with significantly lower levels in the study group than those in the control group. The study group had a significant lower proportion of patients with grade 0/grade 1 granulation tissue than the control group, and had a significantly higher proportion of patients with grade 2/grade 4 granulation tissue than the control group, but the proportion of patients with grade 3 granulation tissue in the two groups was not greatly different. The study group experienced notably shorter wound healing time and hospitalization time than the control group. A notably higher overall response rate was found in the study group than that in the control group. In addition, the total incidence of adverse reactions was not greatly different between the two groups. BMI, diabetes mellitus type, Wagner grading and classification of diabetic foot infection were found to be the risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients, and Wagner grading was an independent risk factor affecting the prognosis of patients.
conclusionEpalrestat is effective in treating DFI, because it can lower the levels of serum inflammatory factors, shorten the time of wound healing and hospitalization, and promote the growth and recovery of granulation, without increasing adverse reactions. Therefore, it is worthy of clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37969201PMC10641352W4388737384What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.