ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
A deep learning-based system for mediastinum station localization in linear EUS (with video).
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and clinical validation of a novel deep learning-based mediastinal endoscopic ultrasound navigation system for quality control: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Explainability of a Deep Learning Model for Mediastinal Lymph Node Station Classification in Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS).Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis of esophageal subepithelial lesions.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- A semi-supervised convolutional neural network for diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on EUS-FNA cytological images.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- A New Deep Learning-Based Method for Automated Identification of Thoracic Lymph Node Stations in Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS): A Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Student ultrasound education, current view and controversies. Role of Artificial Intelligence, Virtual Reality and telemedicine.The ultrasound journal · 2024Review
- Enhancing gastrointestinal stromal tumor risk stratification: A novel deep learning approach applied to EUS imaging.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: EUS is a crucial diagnostic and therapeutic method for many anatomical regions, especially in the evaluation of mediastinal diseases and related pathologies. Rapidly finding the standard stations is the key to achieving efficient and complete mediastinal EUS imaging. However, it requires substantial technical skills and extensive knowledge of mediastinal anatomy. We constructed a system, named EUS-MPS (EUS-mediastinal position system), for real-time mediastinal EUS station recognition. Methods: The standard scanning of mediastinum EUS was divided into 7 stations. There were 33 010 images in mediastinum EUS examination collected to construct a station classification model. Then, we used 151 videos clips for video validation and used 1212 EUS images from 2 other hospitals for external validation. An independent data set containing 230 EUS images was applied for the man-machine contest. We conducted a crossover study to evaluate the effectiveness of this system in reducing the difficulty of mediastinal ultrasound image interpretation. Results: For station classification, the model achieved an accuracy of 90.49% in image validation and 83.80% in video validation. At external validation, the models achieved 89.85% accuracy. In the man-machine contest, the model achieved an accuracy of 84.78%, which was comparable to that of expert (83.91%). The accuracy of the trainees' station recognition was significantly improved in the crossover study, with an increase of 13.26% (95% confidence interval, 11.04%-15.48%; Conclusions: This deep learning-based system shows great performance in mediastinum station localization, having the potential to play an important role in shortening the learning curve and establishing standard mediastinal scanning in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.