Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37969087›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2023

Measuring body temperature in birds - the effects of sensor type and placement on estimated temperature and metabolic rate.

Fredrik Andreasson, Elin Rostedt, Andreas Nord

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fredrik AndreassonDepartment of Biology, Section for Evolutionary Ecology, Lund University, Ecology Building, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7631-4258
Elin RostedtDepartment of Biology, Section for Evolutionary Ecology, Lund University, Ecology Building, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Andreas NordDepartment of Biology, Section for Evolutionary Ecology, Lund University, Ecology Building, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6170-689X
Lund University · SE

Funding

Lund UniversityRoyal Physiographic Society 42353Vetenskapsrådet 2020-04686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several methods are routinely used to measure avian body temperature, but different methods vary in invasiveness. This may cause stress-induced increases in temperature and/or metabolic rate and, hence, overestimation of both parameters. Choosing an adequate temperature measurement method is therefore key to accurately characterizing an animal's thermal and metabolic phenotype. Using great tits (Parus major) and four common methods with different levels of invasiveness (intraperitoneal, cloacal, subcutaneous, cutaneous), we evaluated the preciseness of body temperature measurements and effects on resting metabolic rate (RMR) over a 40°C range of ambient temperatures. None of the methods caused overestimation or underestimation of RMR compared with un-instrumented birds, and body or skin temperature estimates did not differ between methods in thermoneutrality. However, skin temperature was lower compared with all other methods below thermoneutrality. These results provide empirical guidance for future research that aims to measure body temperature and metabolic rate in small bird models.

Indexed as

Body TemperaturePasseriformesAnimalsBasal MetabolismBody Temperature RegulationTemperatureEndothermHeterothermyParus majorPIT tagRFIDThermoregulation

Identifiers

PMID37969087
PMCPMC10753514
OpenAlexW4388728102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.