Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37968721›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2023

Using geometric wing morphometrics to distinguish Aedes japonicus japonicus and Aedes koreicus.

Felix G Sauer, Wolf Peter Pfitzner, Hanna Jöst, Leif Rauhöft, Konstantin Kliemke, Unchana Lange, Anna Heitmann, Stephanie Jansen, Renke Lühken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Felix G SauerBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany. felix.sauer@bnitm.de.
Wolf Peter PfitznerKommunale Aktionsgemeinschaft Zur Bekämpfung Der Schnakenplage e. V. (KABS), Georg-Peter-Süß-Str. 3, 67346, Speyer, Germany.
Hanna JöstBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Leif RauhöftBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Konstantin KliemkeBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Unchana LangeBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Anna HeitmannBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Stephanie JansenBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Renke LühkenBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany 01Kl2022German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture 2819107A22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAedes japonicus japonicus (Theobald, 1901) and Aedes koreicus (Edwards, 1917) have rapidly spread in Europe over the last decades. Both species are very closely related and occur in sympatry. Females and males are difficult to distinguish. However, the accurate species discrimination is important as both species may differ in their vectorial capacity and spreading behaviour. In this study, we assessed the potential of geometric wing morphometrics as alternative to distinguish the two species.

methodsA total of 147 Ae. j. japonicus specimens (77 females and 70 males) and 124 Ae. koreicus specimens (67 females and 57 males) were collected in southwest Germany. The left wing of each specimen was removed, mounted and photographed. The coordinates of 18 landmarks on the vein crosses were digitalised by a single observer. The resulting two-dimensional dataset was used to analyse the differences in the wing size (i.e. centroid size) and wing shape between Ae. j. japonicus and Ae. koreicus using geometric morphometrics. To analyse the reproducibility of the analysis, the landmark collection was repeated for 20 specimens per sex and species by two additional observers.

resultsThe wing size in female Ae. koreicus was significantly greater than in Ae. j. japonicus but did not differ significantly for males. However, the strong overlap in wing size also for the females would not allow to discriminate the two species. In contrast, the wing shape clustering was species specific and a leave-one-out validation resulted in a reclassification accuracy of 96.5% for the females and 91.3% for the males. The data collected by different observers resulted in a similar accuracy, indicating a low observer bias for the landmark collection.

conclusionsGeometric wing morphometrics provide a reliable and robust tool to distinguish female and male specimens of Ae. j. japonicus and Ae. koreicus.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsEuropeFemaleGermanyIntroduced SpeciesMaleReproducibility of ResultsSpecies SpecificityAedes japonicus japonicusAedes koreicusGeometric wing morphometricsIdentification

Identifiers

PMID37968721
PMCPMC10648383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.