Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37968593›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2023

Rapid implementation of home oxygen treatment and remote monitoring for COVID-19 patients at the verge of the Omicron wave in Turku, Finland.

Janne Hänninen, Ulla Anttalainen, Maritta Kilpeläinen, Ulla Hohenthal, Niklas Broman, Jenni Palmén, Jarmo Oksi, Thijs Feuth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janne HänninenDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Allergology, Division of Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Ulla AnttalainenDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Allergology, Division of Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Maritta KilpeläinenDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Allergology, Division of Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Ulla HohenthalDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Niklas BromanTurku City Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Jenni PalménDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Allergology, Division of Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Jarmo OksiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Thijs FeuthDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Allergology, Division of Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. matfeu@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6691-556X
University of Turku · FITurku City Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Turku, Finland, we introduced a home oxygen treatment and app-based monitoring program for hospitalized COVID-19 patients to facilitate an early discharge during the Omicron wave. In this case series we explore the clinical parameters of patients enrolled in the program and evaluate the cost-benefit and safety issues of the program.

methodsHospitalized COVID-19 patients with marked hypoxemia but otherwise in stable condition were screened from Turku City Hospital and Turku University Hospital by treating doctors for eligibility in the program. Peripheral oxygen saturation of > 92% and breathing frequency < 30/min in rest with oxygen supplementation were among the criteria. All patients actively participating in the program between 10

resultsNineteen COVID-19 patients were included in this case series and recruited from three different hospital departments in the Turku city region, South-West Finland. All patients were male, the median age was 59 years and the median duration of hospitalization before enrolment in the program was 6 days (range 3-20 days). The median duration of home oxygen treatment was 13 days (range 3-72 days) and the median duration of home monitoring was 18 days (range 7-41 days). A total of 210,5 hospital days were prevented, resulting in savings of €144,490 of healthcare expenditure (on average 9 days and €7,605 per patient). No major safety issues were reported during the program.

conclusionsIn our case series, home oxygen treatment combined with home monitoring was safe and economically beneficial. Application based monitoring could be considered in other post-acute pulmonary conditions to reduce hospitalization and healthcare costs.

Indexed as

COVID-19FemaleFinlandHumansInfantMaleOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapySARS-CoV-2OxygenCOVID-19HypoxemiaOmicronRemote oxygen treatmentSARS-CoV-2Telemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37968593
PMCPMC10647078
OpenAlexW4388701054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.