Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37968588›Full record

ReviewBMC pediatrics2023

Neonatal inpatient dataset for small and sick newborn care in low- and middle-income countries: systematic development and multi-country operationalisation with NEST360.

James H Cross, Christine Bohne, Samuel K Ngwala, Josephine Shabani, John Wainaina, Olabisi Dosunmu, Irabi Kassim, Rebecca E Penzias, Robert Tillya, David Gathara and 18 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

James H Cross *Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. james.cross@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7351-6601
Christine Bohne *Rice360 Institute for Global Health Technologies, Rice University, Texas, USA.
Samuel K NgwalaResearch Support Center, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Josephine ShabaniIfakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
John WainainaKenya Medical Research Institute, Wellcome Trust Research Program, Nairobi, Kenya.
Olabisi DosunmuAPIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Irabi KassimIfakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Rebecca E PenziasMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Robert TillyaIfakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
David GatharaMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Evelyn ZimbaRice360 Institute for Global Health Technologies, Rice University, Texas, USA.
Veronica Chinyere EzeakaDepartment of Paediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.
Opeyemi OdedereRice360 Institute for Global Health Technologies, Rice University, Texas, USA.
Msandeni ChiumeDepartment of Paediatrics, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (Formerly College of Medicine, University of Malawi), Blantyre, Malawi.
Nahya SalimIfakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Kondwani KawazaDepartment of Paediatrics, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (Formerly College of Medicine, University of Malawi), Blantyre, Malawi.
Norman LufesiDepartment of Curative and Medical Rehabilitation, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Grace IrimuDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Olukemi O TongoDepartment of Paediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Lucas MallaMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Chris PatonNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Louise T DayMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Maria OdenRice360 Institute for Global Health Technologies, Rice University, Texas, USA.
Rebecca Richards-KortumRice360 Institute for Global Health Technologies, Rice University, Texas, USA.
Elizabeth M MolyneuxDepartment of Paediatrics, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (Formerly College of Medicine, University of Malawi), Blantyre, Malawi.
Eric O Ohuma *Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Joy E Lawn *Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
with NEST360 Neonatal Inpatient Dataset Learning Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvery Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) coverage target 4 necessitates national scale-up of Level-2 Small and Sick Newborn Care (SSNC) (with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)) in 80% of districts by 2025. Routine neonatal inpatient data is important for improving quality of care, targeting equity gaps, and enabling data-driven decision-making at individual, district, and national-levels. Existing neonatal inpatient datasets vary in purpose, size, definitions, and collection processes. We describe the co-design and operationalisation of a core inpatient dataset for use to track outcomes and improve quality of care for small and sick newborns in high-mortality settings.

methodsA three-step systematic framework was used to review, co-design, and operationalise this novel neonatal inpatient dataset in four countries (Malawi, Kenya, Tanzania, and Nigeria) implementing with the Newborn Essential Solutions and Technologies (NEST360) Alliance. Existing global and national datasets were identified, and variables were mapped according to categories. A priori considerations for variable inclusion were determined by clinicians and policymakers from the four African governments by facilitated group discussions. These included prioritising clinical care and newborn outcomes data, a parsimonious variable list, and electronic data entry. The tool was designed and refined by > 40 implementers and policymakers during a multi-stakeholder workshop and online interactions.

resultsIdentified national and international datasets (n = 6) contained a median of 89 (IQR:61-154) variables, with many relating to research-specific initiatives. Maternal antenatal/intrapartum history was the largest variable category (21, 23.3%). The Neonatal Inpatient Dataset (NID) includes 60 core variables organised in six categories: (1) birth details/maternal history; (2) admission details/identifiers; (3) clinical complications/observations; (4) interventions/investigations; (5) discharge outcomes; and (6) diagnosis/cause-of-death. Categories were informed through the mapping process. The NID has been implemented at 69 neonatal units in four African countries and links to a facility-level quality improvement (QI) dashboard used in real-time by facility staff.

conclusionThe NEST360 NID is a novel, parsimonious tool for use in routine information systems to inform inpatient SSNC quality. Available on the NEST360/United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Implementation Toolkit for SSNC, this adaptable tool enables facility and country-level comparisons to accelerate progress toward ENAP targets. Additional linked modules could include neonatal at-risk follow-up, retinopathy of prematurity, and Level-3 intensive care.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesInpatientsChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParturitionPregnancyQuality of Health CareTanzaniaAfricaData for ActionHealth management information systemsHospital recordsInpatient CareLow- and middle-income countriesNeonatalNewbornQuality of careSmall and sick newborn care

Identifiers

PMID37968588
PMCPMC10652643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.