Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37968549›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2024

Classification of rib fracture types from postmortem computed tomography images using deep learning.

Victor Ibanez, Dario Jucker, Lars C Ebert, Sabine Franckenberg, Akos Dobay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating the age of rib fractures throughInternational journal of legal medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victor IbanezForensic Machine Learning Technology Center, Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190/52, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dario JuckerZurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, 3D Centre Zurich, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190/52, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lars C EbertZurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, 3D Centre Zurich, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190/52, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sabine Franckenberg *Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Akos Dobay *Forensic Machine Learning Technology Center, Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190/52, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland. akos.dobay@uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6492-9298

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human or time resources can sometimes fall short in medical image diagnostics, and analyzing images in full detail can be a challenging task. With recent advances in artificial intelligence, an increasing number of systems have been developed to assist clinicians in their work. In this study, the objective was to train a model that can distinguish between various fracture types on different levels of hierarchical taxonomy and detect them on 2D-image representations of volumetric postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) data. We used a deep learning model based on the ResNet50 architecture that was pretrained on ImageNet data, and we used transfer learning to fine-tune it to our specific task. We trained our model to distinguish between "displaced," "nondisplaced," "ad latus," "ad longitudinem cum contractione," and "ad longitudinem cum distractione" fractures. Radiographs with no fractures were correctly predicted in 95-99% of cases. Nondisplaced fractures were correctly predicted in 80-86% of cases. Displaced fractures of the "ad latus" type were correctly predicted in 17-18% of cases. The other two displaced types of fractures, "ad longitudinem cum contractione" and "ad longitudinem cum distractione," were correctly predicted in 70-75% and 64-75% of cases, respectively. The model achieved the best performance when the level of hierarchical taxonomy was high, while it had more difficulties when the level of hierarchical taxonomy was lower. Overall, deep learning techniques constitute a reliable solution for forensic pathologists and medical practitioners seeking to reduce workload.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyDeep LearningRib FracturesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAutopsyFemaleHumansMalePostmortem ImagingRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedDeep learningForensic sciencesPostmortem computed tomographyRib fracture classification

Identifiers

PMID37968549
PMCPMC11790768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.