Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37968546›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024

Effect of incremental PEEP titration on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Emmanuel Easterson Ernest, Sulagna Bhattacharjee, Dalim K Baidya, Rahul K Anand, Bikash R Ray, Virinder K Bansal, Rajeshwari Subramaniam, Souvik Maitra

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emmanuel Easterson ErnestDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine & Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No: 5013, Teaching Block, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110019, India.
Sulagna BhattacharjeeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine & Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No: 5013, Teaching Block, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110019, India.
Dalim K BaidyaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine & Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No: 5013, Teaching Block, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110019, India.
Rahul K AnandDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine & Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No: 5013, Teaching Block, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110019, India.
Bikash R RayDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine & Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No: 5013, Teaching Block, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110019, India.
Virinder K BansalDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rajeshwari SubramaniamDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine & Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No: 5013, Teaching Block, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110019, India.
Souvik MaitraDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine & Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No: 5013, Teaching Block, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110019, India. souvikmaitra@aiims.edu.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) has a significant negative impact and are associated with increased length of hospital stay and cost of care. Emergency surgery is a well-established risk factor for PPC. Previous studies reported that personalized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) might reduce postoperative atelectasis and postoperative pulmonary complications. N = 168 adult patients undergoing major emergency laparotomy under general anesthesia were recruited in this study. A minimum driving pressure based incremental PEEP titration was compared to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O. The primary outcome was PPC up to postoperative day 7. The mean (standard deviation) of the recruited patients was 41.7(16.1)y, and 48.8% (82 of 168 patients) were female. The risk of PPC at postoperative day 7 was similar in both the study groups [Relative risk (RR) (95% Confidence interval, CI) 0.81 (0.58, 1.13); p = 0.25]. In addition, the incidence of intraoperative hypotension [p = 0.75], oxygen-free days at day 28 [p = 0.27], duration of postoperative hospital stay [p = 0.50], length of postoperative intensive care unit stay [p = 0.28], and in-hospital mortality [p = 0.38] were similar in two groups. Incidence of PPC was not reduced with the use of an individualized PEEP strategy based on lowest driving pressure. However, the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia was also not increased with titrated PEEP.Trial Registration: www.ctri.nic.in ; CTRI/2020/12/029765.

Indexed as

HypotensionPulmonary AtelectasisAdultFemaleHumansLaparotomyLungMalePostoperative ComplicationsDriving pressureEmergency surgeryPEEP titrationPostoperative pulmonary complications

Identifiers

PMID37968546
OpenAlexW4388712287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.