ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Practical Classification and Management of Accessory Auricle.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccessory auricle is a common congenital abnormal auricular appendage with various forms of presentation. The authors proposed a practical classification system based on the involved anatomical subunits (tragus, the anterior notch and the intertragal notch) and described the corresponding surgical procedures.
methodsThe authors reviewed and analyzed 80 patients (96 ears) who underwent accessory auricle excisions form January 2018 to December 2021. Accessory auricles were classified into three categories: simple (no deformed subunits), complex (several deformed subunits) and compound (coexistence of simple and complex type). The complex type was subclassified into notch and tragal subtypes. The tragal subtype was subclassified into subtype A, B and C, according to the location, contour and size of the involved tragus. Surgical methods were described, and postoperative outcomes were assessed.
resultsSimple type was the most common type (54%) and compound type was less common (15%). In addition, there were 28 (29%) tragal subtype accessory auricles and 2 (2%) notch subtype. Among the tragal subtype, A was the most commonly observed (25%), followed by B (2%) and C (2%). Patients were followed for an average of 11.3 months. One patient experienced delayed wound healing and 6 patients showed hypertrophic scars. The average aesthetic score, evaluated by a 4-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = excellent), was 3.67 ± 0.06 points. The OSAS and PSAS scores were 9.29 ± 0.44 and 10.84 ± 0.40, respectively.
conclusionsThe innovative classification system of accessory auricles can reflect whether there was a combined deformity and the deformed subunits, and guide decisions on surgical approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.