ArticleAnnals of hematology2024
Detection and quantification of JAK2V617F copy number by droplet digital PCR versus real-time PCR.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring copy number alterations (CNAs) to gain new insight into SCLC heterogeneity.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Artificial base mismatches-mediated PCR (ABM-PCR) for detecting clinically relevant single-base mutations.Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) usually has an adverse prognosis, progressing to acute leukemia or splanchnic vein thromboses (SVTs). Therefore, early diagnosis and intervention are significantly important. Clinically, the burden of JAK2V617F is a vital diagnostic basis, which can be detected during the early stage of MPN. Thus, an accurate and rapid detective technique is urgently required. In recent years, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) has primarily been applied to detect the copies of JAK2V617F, whereas droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), a novel and promising detective tool, can conduct precise and repeatable quantification of nucleic acid copies without relying on the standard curve. In our study, both qPCR and ddPCR are used to evaluate the mutation burden of JAK2V617F in a series of gradient diluted standards and clinical JAK2V617F-positive MPN patients' bone marrow samples collected, while using next-generation sequencing technology (NGS) as a contrast. With the help of statistical methods, our study concluded that ddPCR had a better performance in accuracy, sensitivity, and stability, especially in a low burden. Regarding the accuracy, ddPCR showed a better linearity (Pearson R
Indexed as
Identifiers
37968422What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.