Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37968323›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Neural responses to acute stress predict chronic stress perception in daily life over 13 months.

Marina Giglberger, Hannah L Peter, Gina-Isabelle Henze, Elisabeth Kraus, Christoph Bärtl, Julian Konzok, Ludwig Kreuzpointner, Peter Kirsch, Brigitte M Kudielka, Stefan Wüst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marina GiglbergerDepartment of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Hannah L PeterDepartment of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Gina-Isabelle HenzeDepartment of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Elisabeth KrausDepartment of Psychology, Computational Modeling in Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christoph BärtlDepartment of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Julian KonzokDepartment of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Ludwig KreuzpointnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Peter KirschDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Brigitte M KudielkaDepartment of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Stefan WüstDepartment of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. stefan.wuest@ur.de.
University of Regensburg · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of amygdala, hippocampus, and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) for the integration of neural, endocrine, and affective stress processing was shown in healthy participants and patients with stress-related disorders. The present manuscript which reports on one study-arm of the LawSTRESS project, aimed at investigating the predictive value of acute stress responses in these regions for biopsychological consequences of chronic stress in daily life. The LawSTRESS project examined law students either in preparation for their first state examination (stress group [SG]) or in the mid-phase of their study program (control group [CG]) over 13 months. Ambulatory assessments comprising perceived stress measurements and the cortisol awakening response (CAR) were administered on six sampling points (t1 = - 1 year, t2 = - 3 months, t3 = - 1 week, t4 = exam, t5 =  + 1 week, t6 =  + 1 month). In a subsample of 124 participants (SG: 61; CG: 63), ScanSTRESS was applied at baseline. In the SG but not in the CG, amygdala, hippocampus, and (post-hoc analyzed) right mPFC activation changes during ScanSTRESS were significantly associated with the trajectory of perceived stress but not with the CAR. Consistent with our finding in the total LawSTRESS sample, a significant increase in perceived stress and a blunted CAR over time could be detected in the SG only. Our findings suggest that more pronounced activation decreases of amygdala, hippocampus, and mPFC in response to acute psychosocial stress at baseline were related to a more pronounced increase of stress in daily life over the following year.

Indexed as

AmygdalaPrefrontal CortexHumansHydrocortisonePerceptionSalivaStress, PsychologicalHydrocortisone

Identifiers

PMID37968323
PMCPMC10651906
OpenAlexW4388694691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.