ArticleScientific reports2023
Prediction of alternative pre-mRNA splicing outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A spatial long-read approach at near-single-cell resolution reveals developmental regulation of splicing and polyadenylation sites in distinct cortical layers and cell types.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Altered Protein Structures and Neoepitopes in Lupus Neutrophils From Dysregulated Splicing of Messenger RNA.ACR open rheumatology · 2025Article
- Distinct Transcript-Level Expression Profiles and Unique Alternative Splicing in Inflammatory Myopathies.ACR open rheumatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To understand the biological impact of alternative pre-mRNA splicing, it is vital to know which exons are involved, what protein domains they encode, and how the translated isoforms differ. Therefore, we developed a computational pipeline (RiboSplitter) focused on functional effect prediction. It builds on event-based alternative splicing detection with additional filtering steps leading to more efficient statistical testing, and with detection of isoform-specific protein changes. A key methodological advance is reading frame prediction by translating exonic DNA in all possible frames, then finding a single open reading frame, or a single frame with matches to known proteins of the gene. This allowed unambiguous translation in 93.9% of alternative splicing events when tested on RNA-sequencing data of B cells from Sjögren's syndrome patients. RiboSplitter does not depend on reference annotations and translates events even when one or both isoform(s) are novel (unannotated). RiboSplitter's visualizations illustrate each event with translation outcomes, show event location within the gene, and align exons to protein domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.