ArticleScientific reports2023
Correcting spelling mistakes in Persian texts with rules and deep learning methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unsteady CFD simulation of a rotor blade under various wind conditions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Use of sentiment analysis for capturing hospitalized cancer patients' experience from free-text comments in the Persian language.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop a system for automatically correcting spelling errors in Persian texts using two approaches: one that relies on rules and a common spelling mistake list and another that uses a deep neural network. The list of 700 common misspellings was compiled, and a database of 55,000 common Persian words was used to identify spelling errors in the rule-based approach. 112 rules were implemented for spelling correction, each providing suggested words for misspelled words. 2500 sentences were used for evaluation, with the word with the shortest Levenshtein distance selected for evaluation. In the deep learning approach, a deep encoder-decoder network that utilized long short-term memory (LSTM) with a word embedding layer was used as the base network, with FastText chosen as the word embedding layer. The base network was enhanced by adding convolutional and capsule layers. A database of 1.2 million sentences was created, with 800,000 for training, 200,000 for testing, and 200,000 for evaluation. The results showed that the network's performance with capsule and convolutional layers was similar to that of the base network. The network performed well in evaluation, achieving accuracy, precision, recall, F-measure, and bilingual evaluation understudy (Bleu) scores of 87%, 70%, 89%, 78%, and 84%, respectively.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.