Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37968008›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Continuity of care and consultation mode in general practice: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study using patient-level and practice-level data from before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.

Will Parry, Caroline Fraser, Elizabeth Crellin, Jay Hughes, Emma Vestesson, Geraldine M Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Maintaining continuity in fragmented healthcare systems.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Continuity of Care as Diagnostic Infrastructure.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Will ParryDr Will Parry Ltd, London E8 4NL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9183-2464
Caroline FraserData Analytics, The Health Foundation, London EC4Y 8AP, UK.
Elizabeth CrellinData Analytics, The Health Foundation, London EC4Y 8AP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8774-224X
Jay HughesData Analytics, The Health Foundation, London EC4Y 8AP, UK.
Emma VestessonData Analytics, The Health Foundation, London EC4Y 8AP, UK.
Geraldine M ClarkeData Analytics, The Health Foundation, London EC4Y 8AP, UK Geraldine.Clarke@health.org.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7249-0289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInvestigate trends in continuity of care with a general practitioner (GP) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identify whether continuity of care is associated with consultation mode, controlling for other patient and practice characteristics.

designRetrospective cross-sectional and longitudinal observational studies.

settingPrimary care records from 389 general practices participating in Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum in England.

participantsIn the descriptive analysis, 100 000+ patients were included each month between April 2018 and April 2021. Modelling of the association between continuity of care and consultation mode focused on 153 475 and 125 298 patients in index months of February 2020 (before the pandemic) and February 2021 (during the pandemic) respectively, and 76 281 patients in PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the Usual Provider of Care index. Secondary outcomes included the Bice-Boxerman index and count of consultations with the most frequently seen GP.

resultsContinuity of care was gradually declining before the pandemic but stabilised during it. There were consistent demographic, socioeconomic and regional differences in continuity of care. An average of 23% of consultations were delivered remotely in the year to February 2020 compared with 76% in February 2021. We found little evidence consultation mode was associated with continuity at the patient level, controlling for a range of covariates. In contrast, patient characteristics and practice-level supply and demand were associated with continuity.

conclusionsWe set out to examine the association of consultation mode with continuity of care but found that GP supply and patient demand were much more important. To improve continuity for patients, primary care capacity needs to increase. This requires sufficient, long-term investment in clinicians, staff, facilities and digital infrastructure. General practice also needs to transform ways of working to ensure continuity for those that need it, even in a capacity-constrained environment.

Indexed as

COVID-19General PracticeContinuity of Patient CareCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandHumansLongitudinal StudiesPandemicsReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesPatient-Centered CarePrimary CarePUBLIC HEALTHQuality in health careRetrospective StudiesSTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID37968008
PMCPMC10660661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.