ArticleAmerican heart journal2024
Trends in mortality risk of patients with congenital heart disease during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in American heart journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Newborn CCHD Screening Using Pulse Oximetry in the United States.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Remdesivir in COVID-19: A Focus on Pediatric Cardiac Patients.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular conditions are considered risk factors for poor outcomes associated with COVID-19. However, the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mortality of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) is unclear. Our study aims to examine the trends in mortality risk of CHD patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study from the Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium, a US-based registry of interventions for CHD. We included patients having US residence and direct identifiers; death events were captured by matching with the National Death Index. The observation window (2017-2022) was divided into pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 era defined around the national onset of COVID-19 disease in 2020. Stratified Cox model was used to assess all-cause mortality between the pre- and the COVID-19 era.
resultsAmong 45,130 patients with CHD (median age in 2017: 23.3 years, IQR: 19.0-28.4), 503 deaths occurred during the pandemic with 44 deaths (8.7%) attributed to COVID-19 (COVID-19 mortality rate of 0.09%). The overall risk of death for patients with all types of CHD during the pandemic was significantly higher compared to the pre-COVID-19 era (aHR 1.28, 95%CI: 1.08-1.53), with a differential trend towards increased risk in patients with two-ventricle (aHR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.19-1.76) vs unchanged risk for those with single ventricle CHD (aHR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.57-1.21). Adjusted subgroup analysis revealed a higher risk of death during the pandemic for CHD patients with male and chromosomal abnormalities. The excess deaths during the pandemic were attributed to COVID-19 itself rather than CHD or cardiovascular conditions.
conclusionIn this large CHD cohort study, there was a higher risk of death among CHD patients with male and chromosomal abnormalities. A differential trend towards higher risk for those with two vs. unchanged risk for single ventricle CHD was presented. The excess mortality was attributed to the COVID-19 itself and not to conditions potentially related to deferral of care. These results justify targeted protective measures towards the CHD population and may provide guidance for public health and medical care response in future epidemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.