ArticleNature2024
Computational prediction of complex cationic rearrangement outcomes.
Article in Nature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Dilute Synthesis of Macrodiolides and Macrotetrolides Enabled by Confinement Catalysis.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Generative flow model on distance geometry for predicting transition states of chemical reactions.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A Dataset of Plausible Proton Transfer Steps for Arrow-Pushing Mechanisms.Scientific data · 2026Article
- The Promise and Pitfalls of Artificial Intelligence in the Evaluation of Synthetic "Greenness".ChemSusChem · 2025Article
- Computer-Generated, Mechanistic Networks Assist in Assigning the Outcomes of Complex Multicomponent Reactions.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Systematic, computational discovery of multicomponent and one-pot reactions.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Estimation of multicomponent reactions' yields from networks of mechanistic steps.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Recent years have seen revived interest in computer-assisted organic synthesis
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.