ArticleNature2024
SO
Article in Nature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational challenges in exoplanet atmospheric retrieval.Living reviews in computational astrophysics · 2026Review
- Insights into the diversity of exoplanet atmospheres in the era of JWST.Astrophysics and space science · 2026Review
- Article
- Exploring exoplanet dynamics with JWST: Tides, rotation, rings, and moons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Article
- Respiration Drives Dynamic Metal-Organic Framework for Smart Photoresponse to Volatile Toxic Vapors and Their Photodynamic Sterilization.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Extreme weather variability on hot rocky exoplanet 55 Cancri e explained by magma temperature-cloud feedback.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Exploring synergies between Twinkle and Ariel: a pilot study.Experimental astronomy · 2025Article
- Laboratory infrared spectra and fragmentation chemistry of sulfur allotropes.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
46 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
WASP-107b is a warm (approximately 740 K) transiting planet with a Neptune-like mass of roughly 30.5 M
Identifiers
37967578What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.