Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37967377›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2023

Harmonized Life-Cycle Inventories of Nanocellulose and Its Application in Composites.

Seth Kane, Sabbie A Miller, Kimberly E Kurtis, Jeffrey P Youngblood, Eric N Landis, W Jason Weiss

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Seth KaneDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6940-1369
Sabbie A MillerDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6888-7312
Kimberly E KurtisSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1252-7323
Jeffrey P YoungbloodSchool of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8720-8642
Eric N LandisDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, United States.
W Jason WeissSchool of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.
University of California, Davis · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USOregon State University · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of Maine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) and nanofibers (CNF) have been broadly studied as renewable nanomaterials for various applications, including additives in cement and plastics composites. Herein, life cycle inventories for 18 previously examined processes are harmonized, and the impacts of CNC and CNF production are compared with a particular focus on GHG emissions. Findings show wide variations in GHG emissions between process designs, from 1.8-1100 kg CO

Indexed as

NanofibersNanoparticlesNanostructuresCelluloseCellulosecellulose nanocrystal (CNC)cellulose nanofiber (CNF)cementlife cycle assessment (LCA)nanocompositeplastic

Identifiers

PMID37967377
PMCPMC10702438
OpenAlexW4388687831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.